So let's talk about my not so successful Genesis entry. The one I had high hopes for but yes, polarized judges even more spectacularly than it did in 2008. The highest score? 95. The lowest? 49. The middle? 52. Ouch!
To be honest, it's not unusual for this particular manuscript. In its last contest before Genesis it got a 150 and a 96. I have no clue what it is that makes judges either love it or want to put their heads through a wall, but at least they're not bored!
So let's have a look at some of the judges' comments so you can see what I mean :)
Professional Impact
Need to work on punctuation, especially; some grammar mistakes, as well. Overly long sentences and unacceptable analogies make for difficult reading.
The story is nearly ready for publication. Only a little bit of tweaking relative to pronoun confusion and making the POV character more likable.
Story
Opening tells a lot about the character but doesn’t make me care about her, or let me know what’s at stake, right away.
Some good examples of sensory details but some of the basics (where, when) do not come clear until several pages into the story
Lots of fresh, creative imagery.
The story felt like many I’ve read before. I saw no new twists or unique elements to hold my attention.
Where spoke of spiritual things, some of the characters were so cliché and one dimensional that it was almost painful.
The story is interesting. I particularly liked the play with the friend’s conflicting advice much like Job’s situation.
Good imagery, language and cadence support the tone of the story.
Characterization
Her friends seem to have similar personalities and it’s hard to tell them apart. I like her sister, though. She’s a distinctive character yet realistic and believable.
Some secondary characters are caricatures, others are very one dimensional.
I do enjoy the lead character's sarcasm, but there needs to be some element to engage the reader and help them to sympathize with her.
Conflict
I’m having a hard time feeling her pain.
There are no unusual turns or unexpected ways to resolve the conflict. I felt as if I’d already watched this film a dozen times before.
Well done! Both inner and exterior conflict well demonstrated.
Dialogue
Dialogue mostly seems natural, but could be tighter. Hard to distinguish between the friends.
The dialogue was often so cliché and stereo typical that it made reading on difficult.
Very good
Strengths and Weaknesses
Lots of fresh, interesting writing but don’t overdo this. Too much of it slows down the flow of the story. I think you have the potential to develop a good voice but don’t force it so much.
Cliché phrases and characters, long-long-long sentences that try too hard. There were a few very nice phrases, and the story will fit well into the CBA marketplace.
Tone and cadence are well done. Most story elements are very strong.
When I first started writing I tried to incorporate all judges' comments. Which ended up with my manuscript being a nonsensical mess.
You have to know your work, know your voice, well enough to know what will strengthen your manuscript, and what will gut it and what says more about a judge's own biases than the quality of your writing.
A general rule of thumb is that if two or more judges comment on the same thing as being an issue, it is. For Genesis I had two judges comment the heroine wasn't sympathetic enough.
They confirmed what I suspected. Since Genesis was only 15 pages I heavily edited down my first chapter. I suspected I had cut out too much, and that readers didn't know enough about my heroine to care about her before the crisis hit.
However, another comment was that some of the spiritual content was trite and cliched. She's right, it was, but I wrote it that way on purpose for reasons that become clear later in the book - so that comment will be put to one side.
And then you've got the irreconcilable - one judge saying your story is blah and boring, another saying it was compelling and gripping. Or sometimes they just flat out get it wrong - one judge marked me down for not saying what my heroine's occupation is when it's stated on about page 3.
Ultimately, not even Karen Kingsbury gets all five star reviews. As long as you can honestly ay you weighed all the judges comments with an open mind, you have to trust your gut instinct as to what is right for your manuscript.
After all one person's favourite book ever is another person's would rather watch paint dry :)
What about you? If you're a writer what the best or worst contest feedback you ever got? If you're not, what was one book that everyone was raving about but just wasn't for you?














